Ungated Post | 01 Feb 2021

Australia, the lucky country once again?

Australia’s experience with the COVID-19 pandemic fits the country’s moniker as the Lucky Country. The number of cases has been exceptionally low compared with other developed economies, the contraction in output smaller, and the recovery more robust.

Dumb luck has played a part in this. Isolation from the rest of the world made it relatively easy to close the country’s borders, as cross-border flows of people are naturally much lower than in Europe and North America. The concentration of the population in a small number of cities, and relatively low urban density also helped the authorities initially contain the spread and then prevent subsequent outbreaks from moving around the country.

But the country has also made its own luck. The authorities responded early, arguably before the full extent of the crisis was clear. They acted quickly to close the international border in early-February, with all international arrivals required to complete quarantine from late-March onwards. And public health officials began to build test, track and trace capacity and medical stockpiles from late January onwards, resulting in no major shortages through the early months of the pandemic.

For the economy, the Federal government and central bank moved quickly and decisively. The RBA was one of the first central banks to put emergency levers in place, and by the end of March the Federal government had committed over A$150bn in direct support (around 8% of GDP), one of the largest packages amongst the G20.

So will the country’s luck last? Somewhat ironically one of the central pillars of the country’s COVID response—the closure of the international border—is having a permanent, negative impact on the economy. In normal times the country attracts a substantial number of overseas migrants (239,000 in 2019), with these flows accounting for over half of all population growth.

The closure of the border and return home of temporary workers and students has seen these flows turn negative, and while a recovery is expected it will take time; the government expects 1 million fewer migrants over the next four years. The resulting fall in the number of workers will reduce the economy’s productive potential by around 4%. As a result, the long-run economic impact of COVID will likely be the largest amongst the developed economies.

You may be interested in

Post

Oxford Economics enhances its real estate solutions with the addition of MSCI data

Oxford Economics is delighted to announce a significant product enhancement to its Real Estate Economics Service and Global Economic Model, with the addition of MSCI historic real estate index data.  

Find Out More

Post

From Floppy Disks to AI: A Fireside Chat with Adrian Cooper, CEO of Oxford Economics

Discover the journey of Adrian Cooper, CEO of Oxford Economics, in shaping the firm into a global leader, along with his insights and vision for the future in an exclusive interview.

Find Out More

Post

Oxford Economics introduces new Global Tech Spend Forecasts

Oxford Economics is excited to announce the launch of the Global Tech Spend Forecasts service, offering the most reliable forecasts on enterprise IT spending across 35 industries and 25 countries, with forecasts out to 2050.

Find Out More