Beyond the Headlines | 12 Apr 2024
How Inflation eroded governments’ debts and why it matters | Beyond the Headlines
Gabriel Sterne
Head of Global Emerging Markets
Our latest video for asset managers
The supply-shocks era (2020-23) represented the first time in a generation where inflation significantly eroded the real value of global public debt.
In this week’s video, Gabriel Sterne, Head of Global Emerging Markets, focuses on the extent to which governments seized that opportunity.
Click here to check out previous Beyond the Headlines episodes.
I’m Gabriel Sterne, Head of Global Emerging markets at Oxford Economics
Question: During your entire career, what is the comment you have heard most at economics events you have attended?
For me, no question…its “Governments will eventually inflate away their debt”
Today Im going to speak about that with reference to my recently published research “How inflation eroded governments’ debts and why it matters”
My narrow focus is on extent to which governments seized that opportunity in the supply shocks era (2020-23).
After all, there was rampant inflation and you couldn’t really blame most governments for it… Surely this was the moment for inflation erosion opportunists.
But the anatomy of what actually happened may surprise you.
In the average Emerging Market, inflation erosion 3.7% of GDP over the whole period; for the average for advanced economy it was actually twice that.
Its that way simply because AEs have much bigger piles of debt
That’s how the inflation tax works, its impact on debt is the fall in real effective interest rates multiplied by the initial debt stock
For both EMs and AEs the decline in the real effective interest rate was about the same, 2.5% lower in 2020-23 relative to 2019
Why does it matter?
- The period turned preconceptions upside down regarding the location of safe havens for global bonds; EM policymakers got ahead of the curve and enhanced credibility relative to advanced economies.
- Average returns for safe havens Switzerland, US and Japan were -13%; in contrast the four riskier sovereigns (Mexico, Brazil, South Africa and Colombia) it was +11%.
- The period offers little support for those predicting that one day governments will inflate away their debt problems.
- Inflation erosion of debt has been associated with very high economic costs,
- Oh, and government debt-to-GDP ratios did actually increase overall, lest we forget.
- Its certainly not a good advert for inflation erosion as a policy choice.
Thanks, and see you next time!
Access the full report here
Actionable, timely intelligence to sharpen your investment decisions
Weak economic growth over the past decade didn’t slow a stellar market – especially equity returns. But current economic realities – from US monetary tightening to China’s broken growth model – are likely to complicate results in the medium-term future.
To help investment professionals make decisions that maximise opportunities in today’s market, Oxford Economics offers in-depth coverage, and a robust macro and asset allocation framework. Our products and services help decision-makers cut through the noise – offering the intelligence needed to develop in-depth economic models, understand the industry landscape, evaluate investment possibilities, and make profitable decisions.
Tags:
Related Reports
Click here to subscribe to our asset management newsletter and get reports delivered directly to your mailbox
Strategy Key Themes 2025: Opportunities amid heightened uncertainty
Gold rush will lose steam, but still a good strategic bet
Economics for Asset Managers
Read more of our analysis and reports on asset management and economic outlook.
Read more: Economics for Asset Managers