Blog | 03 Jul 2024
Risks in our Q2 IFRS 9 and CECL scenarios more evenly spread reflecting monetary policy and geopolitical uncertainty
Marc Pacitti
Lead Economist, Scenarios and Macro Modelling
The Q2 update of our IFRS 9 and CECL scenarios services continues to see a moderate downside weight to risks around our baseline forecast. The direction of risks around the baseline forecast is informed by our Global Risk Survey which is compiled each quarter by a representative sample of our clients spread around the world.
Capturing the current benign economic environment and low volatility in financial markets, clients responding to the survey remain relatively upbeat in their risk assessment. However, compared to the March survey, the number of respondents seeing risks as balanced has fallen in the latest results. Interestingly, the portion of respondents seeing risks as skewed to the upside has risen by around the same amount as those seeing risks as more skewed to the downside.
This increase to either side of the distribution may reflect heightened uncertainty around various near-term risks, as shown in the responses to the thematic questions asked in our survey. For example, one of the top downside risks cited by clients is that of further monetary policy tightening. But at the same time substantial monetary policy loosening is the top upside risk for 38% of respondents.
In addition to the lingering uncertainty around the near-term direction of monetary policy, respondents to our survey also diverge in their view of the probable effects of a second Trump presidency. Around one in ten respondents list this as their top downside risk, whilst the same proportion list it as their top upside risk.
This two-sided uncertainty around the possible impacts from key risks captures the underlying spirit of why the IFRS 9 and CECL accounting standards were introduced. In practice, these set of rules require lenders to explore risk to both sides of the baseline and to base the level of their capital provisions on the average across these projections.
In our upside scenarios, a surge in demand reinvigorates inflationary pressures. In response, the Federal Reserve and other central banks across the world tighten policy even further. However, the additional increase in policy rates is countered by robust employment and income growth supporting confidence levels and thus asset prices. Conversely, in our downside scenarios, central banks start lowering their policy rates much faster than expected in our base case to counter a broadening economic downturn. Despite the reduced pressure from currently elevated borrowing costs, the resulting fall in asset prices still leads to a sharp tightening in financial conditions.
In current narrative-based risk scenarios the direction of change in interest rates is generally the opposite to the above description. This is because higher rates are seen as a downside risk to the outlook, if not met with a corresponding strengthening of demand and labour markets remaining tight. But when we compare our IFRS 9/CECL scenarios to such narrative-based downside scenarios, we can see that the severity of the impacts to key macroeconomic indicators such as GDP, unemployment rates, and a broad range of asset prices is much greater.
This is because our quarterly IFRS 9 and CECL scenarios are developed from uncertainty distributions based on nearly three decades of forecast errors. This sample includes several periods of heightened global uncertainty, such as the dot-com bubble, Global Financial Crisis and the Covid-19 pandemic, which helps to ensure that our uncertainty distributions are representative of the risks around the forecast. Using specific percentile points in the distributions of several key metrics such as GDP, unemployment, house prices and equity prices we construct five alternative scenarios at a globally consistent level to help clients assess local and global risk over the expected lifetime of assets.
Click here if you want to learn more about our IFRS 9 service and here for our CECL service.
Author
Marc Pacitti
Lead Economist, Scenarios and Macro Modelling
+44 (0) 203 910 8138
Private: Marc Pacitti
Lead Economist, Scenarios and Macro Modelling
Oxford, United Kingdom
Tags:
You may be interested in
Japan’s BoJ outlook update – Rate hike is now more likely in January
We now believe that the Bank of Japan will wait until January to hike the policy rate. We previously assumed a 60% chance of a hike at the meeting on December 19, but recent media reports signal that more board members will likely prefer to wait to see more data to confirm the momentum of wage-driven inflation and US policy developments.
Find Out More
Eurozone: How to set policy in an era of frequent supply shocks
Oxford Economics' new proprietary business cycle indicator shows that real US construction spending is firmly in a decelerating growth phase.
Find Out More
Japan’s shock election defeat for the LDP, but policy shift unlikely
The ruling Liberal Democratic party and its partner Komeito lost their majority in Japan's lower house elections on Sunday, which means the two parties will likely be forced to manage the government as a minority ruling coalition.
Find Out More
Nordics: Growing tailwinds to support a cyclical recovery
We expect growth across the Nordic economies to pick up in the near term, with quarterly growth in Sweden and Norway among the highest across advanced economies by late next year, driven by cyclical tailwinds and policy easing
Find Out More