Recent Release | 20 Mar 2023
True Cost of Compliance – 2023 Report
Thought Leadership and Economic Consulting Teams
Oxford Economics
This report updates our 2020 research on the detection and prevention of financial crime, and it’s cost to the UK financial services sector. We surveyed 300 senior compliance executives about their costs and compliance activities, and used these results to estimate the costs across the UK Financial Services sector. The report, by LexisNexis Risk Solutions, includes interviews with senior compliance officials, and presents the factors driving increases in compliance costs, and how people and technology are employed across the full range of compliance obligations in the fight against fraud and money laundering.
Our survey explored in depth the trends in compliance costs across Financial Institutions in compliance departments and more front line roles, the factors driving compliance costs, and breakdown by type and compliance activity. We then carried out econometric analysis to calculate the total financial crime compliance cost for the UK financial services sector, as well as providing further analysis. This shows that the new sanctions relating to the Ukraine conflict affect a minority of institutions and is not a material factor to explain the persistent increase in compliance costs, which is mostly driven by keeping up with regulatory expectations. There are signs that financial institutions are upgrading their compliance approach, using more technology to improve efficiency and effectiveness.
The experts behind the research
John and Ben, members of the Thought Leadership and Economic Consulting teams, respectively, bring years of experience working with clients around the globe and across sectors to build models, forecast markets, run extensive surveys, and evaluate interventions using state-of-the art techniques.
John Reiners
Managing Editor, UK & EMEA, Thought Leadership
Ben Skelton
Lead Econometrician, Economic Consulting
Tags:
You might be interested in
Japan’s on course for July rate hike, but risk of June increases
The Bank of Japan (BoJ) kept its policy rate at 0.50% at Wednesday's meeting, as expected. Despite a marginally higher increase in pay than last year at the first round of the spring wage negotiations, our baseline view is for the BoJ to hike its policy rate only gradually due to concerns about the capacity of small firms to raise wages and the lacklustre rate of consumption.
Find Out More
Japan’s supply-driven food inflation to persist longer than expected
We have revised our CPI forecast upwards for this year and next, due to more persistent supply side-driven food inflation, led by soaring prices of rice. Despite the significant revision to the short-term inflation path, we don't expect the Bank of Japan (BoJ) to react with a rate hike.
Find Out More
Tariffs hurt, even if some are just threats
Tariffs don't have to be imposed to wreak economic harm – threats are enough. So the recent flurry of announcements by the US, followed in some cases by swift postponements, are already increasing trade uncertainty and making it less likely that companies will invest.
Find Out More
Japan’s older households to support spending under higher rates
The resilience of consumption is essential to support sustained wage-driven inflation and the Bank of Japan's rate hikes. We see little risk of spending faltering due to the projected gradual rate hikes to 1% because the ageing of society has made households' balance sheets less vulnerable to rate increases.
Find Out More